Comments on: Digg Quicker With the “Dugg” Widget for OS X http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/digg-quicker-with-the-dugg-widget-for-os-x Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:41:28 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: brett http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/digg-quicker-with-the-dugg-widget-for-os-x#comment-226 brett Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:28:55 +0000 http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/digg-quicker-with-the-dugg-widget-for-os-x#comment-226 Thanks for listening Duncan... I bet the Digg guys are pretty crafty at keeping the Digg only coming from the site, and I don't blame them. Thanks for an AWESOME piece of software that has made my life easier and much more convenient! Thanks for listening Duncan… I bet the Digg guys are pretty crafty at keeping the Digg only coming from the site, and I don’t blame them.

Thanks for an AWESOME piece of software that has made my life easier and much more convenient!

]]> By: Duncan http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/digg-quicker-with-the-dugg-widget-for-os-x#comment-224 Duncan Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:30:41 +0000 http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/digg-quicker-with-the-dugg-widget-for-os-x#comment-224 Yep, I'm listening. It has been a commonly requested feature to add a digg button directly into the widget, and I can definitely see how it would be convenient not having to open a browser every time you want to digg a story. Unfortunately, on taking a look into how stories are dugg from digg.com, it's clear that the developers <em>really</em> don't want diggs coming from anywhere but the official site. As for the URL source and submitter name/avatar, they'll most likely be in the next version. Yep, I’m listening.

It has been a commonly requested feature to add a digg button directly into the widget, and I can definitely see how it would be convenient not having to open a browser every time you want to digg a story. Unfortunately, on taking a look into how stories are dugg from digg.com, it’s clear that the developers really don’t want diggs coming from anywhere but the official site.

As for the URL source and submitter name/avatar, they’ll most likely be in the next version.

]]> By: brett http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/digg-quicker-with-the-dugg-widget-for-os-x#comment-208 brett Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:39:42 +0000 http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/digg-quicker-with-the-dugg-widget-for-os-x#comment-208 That would be a bomb widget, indeed... I've always wondered though how the API protects from things like "auto digging" and digg bots. For our own sake, it shouldn't be too easy. That would be a bomb widget, indeed…

I’ve always wondered though how the API protects from things like “auto digging” and digg bots.

For our own sake, it shouldn’t be too easy.

]]> By: Tamar Weinberg http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/digg-quicker-with-the-dugg-widget-for-os-x#comment-206 Tamar Weinberg Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:54:24 +0000 http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/digg-quicker-with-the-dugg-widget-for-os-x#comment-206 Brett, you got it. :) As for the widget, I still think that the best kind of widget to exist would be one that includes the following: 1. Title 2. URL source 3. Submitter name/avatar 4. Description! 5. Digg button In other words, restore old Digg functionality in widget fashion. Why this works: less pageviews for Kevin, better user experience for us. I hope the developer of that widget is listening. ;) Brett, you got it. :)

As for the widget, I still think that the best kind of widget to exist would be one that includes the following:
1. Title
2. URL source
3. Submitter name/avatar
4. Description!
5. Digg button

In other words, restore old Digg functionality in widget fashion. Why this works: less pageviews for Kevin, better user experience for us.

I hope the developer of that widget is listening. ;)

]]> By: brett http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/digg-quicker-with-the-dugg-widget-for-os-x#comment-203 brett Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:27:59 +0000 http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/digg-quicker-with-the-dugg-widget-for-os-x#comment-203 Tamar, The only thing I actually <strong>like</strong> about the new Digg is there are more ways to see people's pictures, blogs and contact them. I found the old Digg rather cryptic and anti-social. Shouts can be annoying. I set my shouts to "Friends Only" and I turned the e-mail notification off. Speaking of friends.... hook me up and <a href="http://digg.com/users/BrettFromTibet" rel="nofollow">add me</a> again!<em> Puweezzzzee? </em> Speaking of easier, wait till Leopard comes out later this month and get that Mac! 10,000,000 of us Apple fanboys on Digg can't be wrong... Tamar,

The only thing I actually like about the new Digg is there are more ways to see people’s pictures, blogs and contact them. I found the old Digg rather cryptic and anti-social.

Shouts can be annoying. I set my shouts to “Friends Only” and I turned the e-mail notification off.

Speaking of friends…. hook me up and add me again! Puweezzzzee?

Speaking of easier, wait till Leopard comes out later this month and get that Mac! 10,000,000 of us Apple fanboys on Digg can’t be wrong…

]]> By: Tamar Weinberg http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/digg-quicker-with-the-dugg-widget-for-os-x#comment-201 Tamar Weinberg Wed, 10 Oct 2007 04:37:14 +0000 http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/digg-quicker-with-the-dugg-widget-for-os-x#comment-201 I still disagree on the benefits of the new Digg, though it's interesting you published this as I'm currently writing another opinion piece on Digg's changes (and whether I like them). Here's a clue: I turned off shouts. It's completely a waste of time. I'm waiting to get a Mac, because I need it to be easier once again. Thanks for the tip! :) I still disagree on the benefits of the new Digg, though it’s interesting you published this as I’m currently writing another opinion piece on Digg’s changes (and whether I like them). Here’s a clue: I turned off shouts. It’s completely a waste of time.

I’m waiting to get a Mac, because I need it to be easier once again. Thanks for the tip! :)

]]>