<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Reverse&#8221; Link Building for Reputation Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/reverse-link-building-for-reputation-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://copybrighter.com/blog/reverse-link-building-for-reputation-management</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielcraig</title>
		<link>http://copybrighter.com/blog/reverse-link-building-for-reputation-management#comment-8721</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielcraig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/reverse-link-building-for-reputation-management#comment-8721</guid>
		<description>"Reverse" link building is a good thought to remove spam links on to a negative page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Reverse&#8221; link building is a good thought to remove spam links on to a negative page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Selevan</title>
		<link>http://copybrighter.com/blog/reverse-link-building-for-reputation-management#comment-2140</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Selevan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 11:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/reverse-link-building-for-reputation-management#comment-2140</guid>
		<description>2 test message</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 test message</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Borders</title>
		<link>http://copybrighter.com/blog/reverse-link-building-for-reputation-management#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Borders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/reverse-link-building-for-reputation-management#comment-1481</guid>
		<description>Michael Martinez,

Thanks for the suggest of what to call this practice - I agree "decoupling" makes better linguistic sense, although it lacks a certain marketing sizzle. And I agree it is not the most efficient practice in the world, but what else can you do to less the relevance of a tenacious negative site without getting into really "blackhat" practices?

p.s. Thanks for stopping by. I've really enjoyed your SEO articles and viewpoints over the years!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Martinez,</p>
<p>Thanks for the suggest of what to call this practice - I agree &#8220;decoupling&#8221; makes better linguistic sense, although it lacks a certain marketing sizzle. And I agree it is not the most efficient practice in the world, but what else can you do to less the relevance of a tenacious negative site without getting into really &#8220;blackhat&#8221; practices?</p>
<p>p.s. Thanks for stopping by. I&#8217;ve really enjoyed your SEO articles and viewpoints over the years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://copybrighter.com/blog/reverse-link-building-for-reputation-management#comment-1480</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/reverse-link-building-for-reputation-management#comment-1480</guid>
		<description>Since you're not "building" anything a better description for this approach would be LINK DECOUPLING.  I would not expect much success in general from this practice but if someone were to ask me what to do about information that is outdated, I might suggest they contact the link providers (agreed that fewer than 100 is better) to see if they would agree to decouple their links.

There is nothing unethical about asking people to change their minds, especially circumstances have changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since you&#8217;re not &#8220;building&#8221; anything a better description for this approach would be LINK DECOUPLING.  I would not expect much success in general from this practice but if someone were to ask me what to do about information that is outdated, I might suggest they contact the link providers (agreed that fewer than 100 is better) to see if they would agree to decouple their links.</p>
<p>There is nothing unethical about asking people to change their minds, especially circumstances have changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Borders</title>
		<link>http://copybrighter.com/blog/reverse-link-building-for-reputation-management#comment-1478</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Borders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/reverse-link-building-for-reputation-management#comment-1478</guid>
		<description>What aspect of politely asking someone if they'd consider no longer linking to a "sucks.com" site or negative revenge article do you consider borderline unethical? Curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What aspect of politely asking someone if they&#8217;d consider no longer linking to a &#8220;sucks.com&#8221; site or negative revenge article do you consider borderline unethical? Curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Allsopp</title>
		<link>http://copybrighter.com/blog/reverse-link-building-for-reputation-management#comment-1477</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Allsopp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/reverse-link-building-for-reputation-management#comment-1477</guid>
		<description>Hmm, bordering on very unethical although its quite an intuitive idea. 

Of course, I'm sure you would only do this if the result was wrong? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, bordering on very unethical although its quite an intuitive idea. </p>
<p>Of course, I&#8217;m sure you would only do this if the result was wrong? <img src='http://copybrighter.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.073 seconds -->
