<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Lawsuits to Remove Negative Content Often Backfire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/why-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-often-backfire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://copybrighter.com/blog/why-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-often-backfire</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Miguel Carter</title>
		<link>http://copybrighter.com/blog/why-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-often-backfire#comment-8695</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/how-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-usually-backfire#comment-8695</guid>
		<description>dtvb4m4txjnhl5vu

只需</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dtvb4m4txjnhl5vu</p>
<p>只需</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tandy</title>
		<link>http://copybrighter.com/blog/why-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-often-backfire#comment-8653</link>
		<dc:creator>Tandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/how-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-usually-backfire#comment-8653</guid>
		<description>只需10元，就能让你的广告遍布各个网站！
支持图片/超链发送！支持分类/地域网站发送！

10元，就可能换来意想不到的效果，为什么不尝试下呢！
QQ：224549200（注明“广告”）</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>只需10元，就能让你的广告遍布各个网站！<br />
支持图片/超链发送！支持分类/地域网站发送！</p>
<p>10元，就可能换来意想不到的效果，为什么不尝试下呢！<br />
QQ：224549200（注明“广告”）</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Dental Marketing Articles: Banish Disparaging Remarks About Your Practice &#124; The SEM Firm</title>
		<link>http://copybrighter.com/blog/why-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-often-backfire#comment-8643</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Dental Marketing Articles: Banish Disparaging Remarks About Your Practice &#124; The SEM Firm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/how-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-usually-backfire#comment-8643</guid>
		<description>[...] In rare cases you can contact an attorney and bring a suit against the defamatory website but many times these suits backfire. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In rare cases you can contact an attorney and bring a suit against the defamatory website but many times these suits backfire. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roz rambach</title>
		<link>http://copybrighter.com/blog/why-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-often-backfire#comment-1778</link>
		<dc:creator>roz rambach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 10:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/how-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-usually-backfire#comment-1778</guid>
		<description>Excellent post!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Allsopp</title>
		<link>http://copybrighter.com/blog/why-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-often-backfire#comment-1503</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Allsopp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/how-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-usually-backfire#comment-1503</guid>
		<description>You make some great points here Brett, good work. I am fully behind using lawsuits only when absolutely necessary but try to stay clear 99% of the time as there's probably a better work around.

Good to see you blogging again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make some great points here Brett, good work. I am fully behind using lawsuits only when absolutely necessary but try to stay clear 99% of the time as there&#8217;s probably a better work around.</p>
<p>Good to see you blogging again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.545 seconds -->
